We are working on different ways of displaying our data to make it more understandable. Our plan is to make the raw data available later in the year.
For now, take a look at how July’s online planning application numbers stacked up.
Chris
 | Adam Tuck on Its largely business as usual… |
 | Mark Kemp on Its largely business as usual… |
 | sarahchilcott on Planning Portal: COVID-19 Busi… |
 | Richard Power on Planning Portal: COVID-19 Busi… |
 | Portal Director on Planning Portal: COVID-19 Busi… |
 | Robert Morton on Planning Portal: COVID-19 Busi… |
 | Jim Parker on Its largely business as usual… |
I have looked at the results of the ‘Poll’ and would ask for about the 3rd or 4th time what about the comments that I sent you about the Poll and outstanding work. I was told that these had been passed to a director but I have never had the courtesy of a response.
Why not.
To now publish results is tantamount to completely ignoring the feedback that you have already had.
Your response would be appreciated.
Stuart
Stuart,
I did respond 2 days ago.
Chris
The statistics should hopefully list – set out:
Applications re
1. No of extensions only.
2. No of new dwellings say up to 25.
3. New dwellings 25 to 100.
3. 100 to 200.
4. Over 200.
As percentages. Then it will reveal how many large applications are going via the portal.
Until mulitiple upload of files is provided large applications do not or will not happen.
Where can I access the raw data? Thanks