The Portal like everyone else is feeling the squeeze, so I hope you’ll forgive me saying a quick thank you to the following folks who have recently helped us out by sponsoring the site.
Not that it is in any way altruistic as we are the number 1 website in our sector don’t you know.
The following businesses have become the first to take up sponsorship of the Interactive Mini Guides and associated content pages. Each sponsor has exposure on the relevant content page, the Interactive Mini Guide and the downloadable PDF of that Mini Guide content.
As of today Betternest have taken up residency in the Extensions
Absolute Lofts are where you might expect them to be all over Loft Conversions and the and The Stable Company – have bolted into Outbuildings
We still have opportunities to sponsor the following Mini Guides:
• Conservatories
• Porches
• Satellites and Antenna
So please get in touch to find out more.
‘Betternest’ have enhanced their friend of the Portal status no end by continuing to sponsor the Interactive House until the end of March whilst we welcome lawyers and barristers No5 Chambers, who have chosen to sponsor the “Planning” area of the site.
If you’d like to join our ever growing band of friends please contact Guy Funnell in our commercial team by email or on 0117 372 8232
Despite the gloomy outlook or perhaps because of it the total number of electronic planning applications soared again in 2010.
There were in total 229,065 planning applications submitted via The Planning Portal compared with 160,825 in 2009 an increase of 42%.
The graph below illustrates the year on year growth of electronic planning application submissions which in addition to the obvious economic benefits also delivers close to 3,000 tonnes of CO2 savings.
Stats by Dan the Statsman
Sorry, but it’s time to talk the the “L” word. Localism that is, not love although being the festive season a little bit of both wouldn’t go amiss.
Assuming that the Portal survives the icy blast of the spending review then I hope we’ll play our part in enabling the agenda.
We’ve certainly got the communication channels to reach neighbourhoods with information and tools and we’ve got the links to LPA websites (both technical and relational) to ‘link things up’. However the question is: in a time of decentralisation what should our role be?
Should we provide information only or would tools and forms help? (Don’t forget we can build them once and use them for many.)
What about lessons learned? As people and communities start to develop local plans should the Portal provide a place for sharing lessons, best practice, tips and tricks or leave it all alone and let something evolve by itself?
I’d love to hear your views.
Chris
As you’ve wandered around the new site layout I hope you’ll have noticed a broader range of companies now advertising with us.
We’ve re-jigged the spaces and opportunities available to make them more targeted and therefore more useful to advertisers.
I hope you don’t find the ads are too obtrusive but if we are going to stay in business we’ve got to find a way of ensuring the business community contributes to the benefit it receives from the Portal.
So thanks then to UKBifold Doors who have chosen to sponsor our homepage and specific content areas and to Betternest who have chosen to sponsor the Interactive House as a means to make people aware of their own exciting solution to the question “Do I need planning permission?”
Energy efficiency specialists Geothermique are advertising in one of our popular common projects area and lawyers Bircham Dyson Bell are advertising on our ‘Planning’ tab.
Newsletter advertisements are also proving popular with many spaces taken for the next few months.
If you’re interested in reaching our customers in the new year then please contact our commercial team directly on 0117 372 8232 or sales@planningportal.gsi.gov.uk
Thanks
Chris
First I’d like to apologise for the lack of content recently. The problem is that in common with many of our colleagues we’re in a period of limbo at the moment while we wait to hear our fate in the Comprehensive Spending Review. We’ve submitted a business case for the next four years and we wait with bated breath.
Meanwhile, we are still beavering away trying to encourage as much online submission as possible and trying to play our part in communicating the ever-changing planning landscape.
On that topic, you may be aware that DCLG is currently consulting on the subject of localisation of planning application fees.
I would like to encourage you to make your views known on the topic. For example, if you submit planning applications to more than one local authority you might like to consider the impact of differentiated fees on the usability of the electronic system.
Meanwhile, if you’re a local planning authority, I’d like to understand how you are planning to operate with regard to electronic applications and in particular our fee calculator.
Feel free to contact me personally if you’re nervous of an open response.
Time is running out so get your twopenneth in quick.
My hard-working colleagues in the technical team are preparing to roll out some important improvements to the Portal in the next week.
We’re currently testing the fixes and improvements on our test environment and plan to push them to the live site on Thursday 9 December.
You can read the list of fixes in this PDF (Release 5.01)
Please let me know if you have any questions about the release.
So just after saying the new site was stabilising, what does it do but prove me wrong.
Yep the site is currently down but this time it’s due to a widespread network problem that IBM are experiencing rather than anything specific to the Planning Portal.
Nevertheless I am really sorry for any trouble this has caused you and rest assured that we are working as quickly as possible to get it back up and running.
Chris
So the new site is live and stabilising – so what next? I hear you ask.
Well we are still a little bit in limbo until the CSR settlements descend however we are not letting the grass grow under our feet.
Like everyone else we have had to adjust to the harsh new economic realities and this has meant some re-structuring and loss of some good friends in our team.
We have downsized our project work – most notably by winding down the e-Consultation project, and we’ll be relying on you good folks to deliver the innovation in services still needed to embed e-planning. We’ve created the opportunity with PortalApps and we’ll be unveiling the first services soon.
Stuart Mockford continues to lead our Corporate Account Team who are still plugging away with planning agents, developers, architects and anyone else still submitting planning applications on paper and Scott Alford is leading on working with LPAs. Both would be very happy to hear from you if we can help in any way.
We are continuing to look at the 1App suite and in particular investigating what quick wins are open to us (more soon).
I hope to be able to publish our Business Plan soon however it is safe to say that our focus will continue to be on driving up the number of online planning applications and on reducing our reliance on public funds. On that note we have some great new advertising and sponsorship opportunities Guy Funnell would be glad to tell you all about them.
Finally, thanks for bearing with us through what has been a difficult period.
Chris
If you’ve visited the Planning Portal this morning you may have noticed a few things have changed.
Last week I wrote about how excited I was about the launch of the new-look Planning Portal and what benefits we think it will deliver to us and to you.
It wasn’t always an easy road to travel but now it’s here the hard work all seems worthwhile and will become more evident as our private sector partners begin to develop their app’s to sit alongside our content.
As with all projects the success of our endeavours rely heavily on how we collaborate with our partners. This post is a short note of thanks to them.
The project started with our users. We worked with user experience experts CX Partners to help shape how the service should work.
We talked to dozens of members of the public, planning professionals and other end users to tell us how the information should be arranged and labelled.
With CX’s help we tested our assumptions with end users, refined the content and tested again. And again.
The look-and-feel elements were developed by Sheffield-based design and web application developers Technophobia.
From the very first concept to the final polished design, Technophobia worked with us, CX and the system integrators to make sure the site was functional and in line with our brand.
Buffalo Design, the company we work with to build the interactive house and the mini-guides, helped with some essential updates to make sure the guides fitted correctly in our new page templates.
Although we largely excluded the online application service from the project (more on that project here), our forms needed some essential tweaking to work with the new design. As ever Apto Solutions were on hand to do the tweaking.
Finally, the site was built on IBM infrastructure using IBM software and some of its very talented developers and solution architects. I hope they can now get some sleep. Thanks to all involved at Hursley and Portsmouth.
I hope you enjoy using the new look Planning Portal and realise the benefits from the improvements we’ve made.
As with all new services, we’ll find little problems – if you find any let me know by adding a comment below.
So thanks, to the partners who helped us deliver our vision and the users who told us what they wanted from the Planning Portal and how it should be delivered.
Hi,
I’ve been asked if there will be a problem with broken links following our redesign. The answer is, hopefully not – but it depends on how you are linking to us.
If you are using the discrete links we recommend in the LPA Links pack then there should be no problem.
Discrete links like “www.planningportal.gov.uk/apply” have been reallocated to the revised pages. There are around 50-60 of these, which we checked very recently.
However, if you have ‘deep’ links to our pages several levels down in the navigation they will inevitably break. There’s not much we can do about this is as the information architecture is fundamentally different and matching every instance across every Local Authority would be an impossible task for us to resource.
To mitigate the inconvenience, we are using a custom Error 404 page (in non-techie speak – ‘we can’t find the page you’re looking for’ here are some suggestions).
This will provide a ‘friendly’ apology for the broken link and highlights the new site map at the bottom of the page showing the top two levels of content.
It also gives you a search box within the context of the error message to help you find what you were after.
Planning Portal Blog 